Tuesday, November 8, 2016
The difference between war crimes and human shields -how the media and politics see the same thing through different glasses
Weird things you can read in the news.
Siege of Mosul (incredible bloodshed, street fighting and massive civilian causalities) is something that we should look at as the forces of good fighting the forces of evil. (I think ISIS is supposed to be the evil here, but given the fact that the US has been supporting these very same guys in the past makes this distinction a bit murky.)
Anyhow. Mosul is great.
Aleppo, however... at Aleppo we see the evil Ruskies and Assad massacring civilians and attacking helpless rebels who are definitely moderate, and would not chop heads off even if they could. Also: the fact that NATO is putting troops right on Russia's borders is something that will ensure peace. Definitely. How else to make sure you have peace other than provoking a nuclear power? By talking to them? Don't make me laugh. (And let's not forget who those rebels really are.)
So. There is an interesting duality how the media (and politicans) deal with bombs that kill civilians depending on who drop said bombs. We can safely conclude that victims of Western airstrikes are collateral damage only. Also, victims of weapons sold by Western powers to barbaric kingdoms and used on civilians are fine. They don't kill civilians. We're the good guys. (Things can get a bit weird when your allies murder your allies, but what the heck. Let this one slide, I say.)
But victims of Russian bombs, however, are victims of a war crime. And the Ruskies are barbarians. Let's just forget the siege of Fallujah, and the indiscriminate killing of civilians of US forces (not to mention the use of white phosphorus against human targets, which is, you know, a war crime).
It's kind of weird when the two sides do the same thing, but they are not really the same. US (or Israel) hits a hospital: oh well, mistakes are being made, sorry. And the terrorists were hiding there deliberately, anyhow, so it's not a mistake. They were also using human shield, forcing us to kill all those people, while at the same time we hit the hospital by mistake.
Ruskies hit a hospital: WAR CRIMINALS. OMG, THEY ARE TOTALLY EVIL. Poor insurgents who are forced to hide in a city against the superior force! Let's send them more weapons!
Seriously. Do a google search. I can imagine all these people's spirit discussing how one side were murdered by an evil regime, and how the other were just collateral damage. I'm sure the victims of Western bombs take a great solace in the knowledge.
It's astonishing. It's so bad, even the Independent noticed it -after several decades too late.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What is wrong with Rings of Power and the criticism of the critics
So Rings of Power season two is coming out, and the flame-wars flared up again on social media. So let's take a look at why people hated...
-
The Social Justice Warriors normally jump on any and all differences in outcome as a proof for oppression. Well, not any and all, because ...
-
Well, this is about actors. It seems that lately even the supposedly smart and wholesome actors fell victim of this trend of wanting only...
-
Well, look at the reactions to an obviously not white guy cosplaying Luke Skywalker . Why it is important is two-fold. 1. You do not need e...
No comments:
Post a Comment