So apparently even the statue of a fish with boobs is racist.
This perfectly fits into the present trend of vandalizing statues of people of old for being something they were not - like our friend, poor Cervantes. And even when the ire of the activists turns on a genuine racist -like Churchill- we still are faced with the fact that they absolutely have no clue who this bird really was, and why he was a racist. (Let's just ignore the fact he did not get a statute for being a racist.)
So we have a wave of statute-toppling by activists who are absurdly ignorant on what they are actually doing in the name of fighting colonization and racism. Poor fish-girl is the low point of this activism, I think - you can't get lower than that I think.
Let's ignore the whole complex issue of colonialism, slavery and whatnot - after all, nuances are not something we like. We want black and white, binary answers.
But this leads to a real slippery slope. Us judging everyone by today's standards means we will have to remove statues and the works of every single person until the last decade or so from public spaces and the public domain. Not to mention twenty years from now everything that survived the purge will be destroyed since it is safe to bet that tomorrow's standards will be different from today's.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What is wrong with Rings of Power and the criticism of the critics
So Rings of Power season two is coming out, and the flame-wars flared up again on social media. So let's take a look at why people hated...
-
The Social Justice Warriors normally jump on any and all differences in outcome as a proof for oppression. Well, not any and all, because ...
-
Well, this is about actors. It seems that lately even the supposedly smart and wholesome actors fell victim of this trend of wanting only...
-
Well, look at the reactions to an obviously not white guy cosplaying Luke Skywalker . Why it is important is two-fold. 1. You do not need e...
No comments:
Post a Comment